Monster Camp

What's that?

have you got?

your reservation?

It's a race in the disposal of mass populations. Or is that a race in the mass disposal of populations. Eisenhower 8-15 million Germans. The Germans  7 million Jews. What news reports were broadcast by the Third Reich to the German people right before their destruction? Good news liberation, right? How does the number of people Eisenhower penned up to die at liberation compare with the number the the Germans penned up to be executed? Eisenhower did not pen up the elite such
Martin Bormann who founded his 500 corporations, founded the Fourth Reich EU. The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU.  

Eisenhower does have the merit of his treaty with the aliens, Greada, which held, though most imperfectly while they kidnapped millions of the same people, the commoners, he penned up in Germany, that is he shares with Obama such treaties, until Obama attacked the Black Knight satellite just in June of 2016. Putin Orders All Fighter Jets Grounded 

Tesla's baby you know. More! Imprisonment. Liberation. But what can that prayer mean, Lay not this to their blame, when they stoned Stephen and he prayed that? How can it not be laid to their blame, to theirs and to all the deaf ears and blind eyes. So the souls of those cried out, when, when will we receive vengeance? Which side? All the chemtrail pilots, the AI bureaucrats, the raging name callers of the boundaryless states of mind that lost their sex, their language, their health? In the end in the days before their trial, before capture they see it coming, they worry about all the corpses left behind that indict them. Not conscience, but guilt climbs down off its watchtower and crawls into their bureaucratic hearts. Hey you people, there's still time for acts of nobility at the end. All you got to do is reverse your field.

We tell ourselves the camps are fictional. We need to tell ourselves the monsters are fictional, that they don't exist even if every movie has one and all text messages and their logos on the frozen foods with hand signs and gemetria like whale spouts sighted from afar. We say these are just mists and maybe bad weather.The thing wrong with this monster war is its lack of image, but the monsters are invisible. If you want to see them you won't like it. If you want to be in the war you won't like it. But we have no choice to be general before these creatures round us up and we kill them. To be tolerated  must be monster ambivalent, capable of seeming attractive even while repellent. Of course that's assuming guns. A good way to see monsters is read Freud and Jung, all monsters imposed upon the human that belong to the Pollyon. Not to miss their henchmen the EU DC bureaucrats which take all shapes and sizes. Remember that the key to getting people to go quietly to the camps to submit to their destruction is to browbeat and indoctrinate them before that they are sub classes, manipulated by elites, told what to do. For it was found that the camps can be virtual, don't have to exist in the real any more, and that people will follow your orders as if they were. To get in the digital monster camp follow the Pope and apologize to gays, let down your borders with Obama, consider going on permanent stipend with the fgov and follow Tucker Carlson.

 The people

Had forfeited the confidence of the government

And could win it back only

By redoubled efforts. Would it not be easier

In that case for the government

To dissolve the people

And elect another?

Bertolt Brecht

In case you are new to earth there are many ways into the ecamps thought myth in previous centuries and hardly realized by the participants from the first, especially as it is fought with quislings of the enemy who govern like Vichy France. That puts the rest of us in the resistance to form a company of resistance. Even if you think you’re not involved you are. Even if you think you're on the other side you’re not. Remember that even if these people are quislings they’re still human. Who the enemy is is one thing to be discussed. How far their inroads of corruption cannot be judged. Who's not in the pyramid! Who the quislings are is harder for they are human, but see their interest to cooperate with the invader. To call an invader what is so long established seems a stretch. You mean the Sumerian tablets are chronicles of the invader? What invader when it has inhabited myth, government, art, fiction and has woven the web of civilization?

So it is curious that we must say that the greatest source of our intelligence as to who this enemy is the enemy. How exactly can this be known  if they all are gone astray, that there is none that does good, no not one? Let us say by their speech we will know them, that they cannot help but reveal themselves in writing and in speaking. Writing is less complex, therefore less able to dissemble. The recent work of Joseph P. Farrell illustrates the point of  the continuing lineage of Nazi experiments in physics, biology and psychology. As an Oxford man he can be expected to write well and enjoyably. He does give pleasure when he speaks of the “wild and weedy undergrowth of the story…about time travel and new lives, with identities so contorted and convoluted that it would take someone with twin PhDs in physics and genealogical research to sort out…for now the story not only included past lives, altered consciousness, time travel and antigravity, but also bizarre and dark experimentation into consciousness manipulation, induced schizophrenic, Nazi U-boats, and pro-Nazi German “colonists, all of which were concentrated in the unlikely east end of Long Island! All of this neo-Gnostic nonsense was a strong deterrent to my desire to publish (Preface, v, Secrets of the Unified Field, 2008). I could get this book alone of all his in the library because the others had been stolen. Lovely stuff, this top secret torsion, and a good way to background much of the writing and work, for if one takes the premise that knowledge of these things begins with German reunification, then as of today we are two decades behind the curve. Of course the curve is much extended, but this begs one to get up on the wave, so Mr. Farrell’s latest effort of 2011 Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men tries to do. Here however the plot thickens, for he says that “pretty much everyone with half a brain, and who has not been lobotomized by the American “education” system or subjected to the psychedelic drugs and mind-numbing electroshock of its dull university curricula, even duller professors and to its “textbooks” that contain no primary texts, is agreed that something is wrong with our standard model of history, particularly the farther back one goes. (Introduction, xi).


 One expects to learn the content neutral standard eventually as a writer, not to advocate and judge, but to let the work speak for itself. So much journalism is engineered to appear unbiased, when it is biased in every way, just not immediately discernable to its audience. Adjectives, even articles often violate this standard. Name-calling, characterizing, violate it, so that when writing becomes political speech it is suspect, even if fascinating and beautifully done with all manner of new factual basis. This is more than mere verbosity.  Tristram Shandy, is a verbose delight too, but a work of fiction. Writing betrays itself. I can read Farrell easily, but then comes the question, whose side are you one, Quisling or Man, for he is not the monster.

Quislings are (French) men too, but one feels embarrassed after expressing such dislike of adjectives to add an adjective like <True> Man. All men are true, even if some are rhetorical liars. I am after all a fiction writer so not under the burden of proof. So when Farrell, appealing already to my baser interests, mocks the reigning powers it seems to me altogether a different thing than me saying, <I’m gonna flush them gods right outta the dome>, like a Broadway musical. Maybe we’re on the same side I thought until reading his summaries of long quotes from the O’Brien’s idea that the One was a space entity, party to the war, and cultivating genes in Israel to produce, well, keep reading.

The idea is fascinating of course, but when I read violations of the content neutral standard it’s about not liking to be rhetorically manipulated. The phrases are innocent in themselves, shibboleths really, of what is supposed to be accepted common moral thought, things such as, when Farrell says the OBriens’ subject the Torah and the God of the Torah  to: “an unhesitating and thoroughly critical examination based on normal standards of human decency and morality and find him thoroughly wanting” (92). Baloney.

That this is verbose we would forgive the Oxford man, that he uses the very language apparatus he earlier condemns in the duller professors and their textbooks, and marries it to the utterly facetious thought that a thing is right because 20 million Frenchmen say so, <normal standards of human decency>  suggests the  normal standards are a hiding place of abject terrors of emotional appeal, and the appeal to them as a basis to judge anything is the lowest possible blow, as if the neighbors got together and voted and democracy made it true. Democracy makes nothing true, only evidence does. Maybe this is just more of my hatred of adjectives.

However to treat the idea seriously, the separation  of the war into monsters and men, to pick one of a hundred dichotomies and to attribute to one side, (which it is is never certain), the interference of an angel (to understate it somewhat) is to turn the tale exactly on its head, upside down, like calling Milton of the party of Satan, as critics liked to do, viewing the good as if it were evil, or as Blake seems, turn analytics against energy. So Lucifer trades places. It’s as simple as a TV show.

One can go on and one about this topper, but to get to the O’Brien/Farrell point, the so called interference of this deity began long before the existence of Israel. Just to take the point of our friend Edward J. Young, that Moses wrote Genesis, (whoever wrote it was no editor, no Elohist, as if the specific were the generic). The telling phrase occurs there to the effect that the seed of the woman is at enmity with the serpent. Each of these terms is worth explication, seed, woman, enmity and serpent, but suffice it to say that the woman is paramount. Corrupt the seed of the woman and the war is won. How to do this of course is the subject of our history and coming events. We hope to hear from you all on how to preserve the seed of the woman, that is, humanity, even in the midst of its quisling betrayals.

 That the war proceeds by subterfuge indicates some very powerful wards must be in place to keep it down. What these wards are can be inferred from the statement of the fight in Gen 3.l5, that is, the seed of the woman at enmity  and that species can only reproduce after their own kind. To get to it, this means that the seed of the woman, the human, is the arch enemy of what the serpent represents. We know the seed of the woman, but the seed of the serpent is obscure, unless you quisling-like take it as simply the age-old fear of snakes and let it go to naturalistically define the world. Naturalism seems to have already died its death and we have entered a new age of myth and mythic struggle that none of has seen and is in the slightest prepared for.

 The good news is that is what you were born for this. Among the Navajo this is a phrase describing lineage, as if Monster Slayer and Yé'iitsoh were somehow a true account in the news. Pundits say it is traditional Navajo culture that says When traditional Navajo people greet each other, they will recount their dinnehih or clan affiliation. But if Navajo culture is not traditional it is not Navajo. That means that the most insidious phrase ever uttered is E Pluribus Unum, the motto on our coin, for it means to strip all ethnicity, traditional identity and boundaries away to substitute the incarnation of monster thought. Navajos might say, "I was 'born to or of' my mother's clan and 'born for' my father's clan." You who live on the earth all together have been born for this.