Hieronymous Bosch, Columbus and Ignatius Loyola

Bosch, detail, Garden of Earthly Delights

Walter Bejamin says history is the residue of vertigo, the vertigo of civilization, a world as "an endless series of facts" "strangely altered" by society into a phantasmagoria of pomp and splendor making society prey to mythic anguish (Arcades, 14-15) which the infected history of science and medicine so document.We argue that these myths at their origin are what Loyola and Bosch oppose.

The premise in Bosch is that from the world’s beginning until the end of time, the familiar is secretive and strange and the flip side, that the uncanny is the familiar in disguise. As a general premise this can have endless commentaries. Consequently, a new worldliness of the modern attempting mythless of everyday detail to replace the larger figures of old religion replaced by humanism. The transition between the old and new is stated in the Lyrical Ballads where Wordsworth and Coleridge each took one end toward the middle, but further highlighted it is the beginning and essence of romanticism, everyday speech, common figures. Old religion replaced by humanism, what is obviously a new religion of poetry. But the ordinary did not replace myth, it embodied it and hid it and bound it to the bizarre. Familiar existence was a trap, a diversion from the Good set by an enemy to destroy the human with the bizarre. War with principalities and powers meaning war with all the forces that govern the earth and civilization. People who are medieval and biblical in thought are going to have a very different take on every mundane subject of history, psychology therefore. This is illustrated in Ignacio Loyola (1491-1556), founder of the Jesuits and the black pope who shared a a time slot with with Hieronymus Bosch a similar view. Their contemporary, Columbus, shared it as well, (1451-1506). The fantastic concepts of Bosch, (c. 1450-1516), painter of the Last Judgment 1482) and the Garden of Earthly Delights, envisions this future and past in the present.

 Ignacio Loyola is presented on one hand as the utter adoree of Jesus and on the other as a complete follower of the Pope, opposing propositions, but the contrast resembles the way as Bosch, the greatest illustrator of hell showing things beyond Dante even, is likewise the  ultimate in adoration of Jesus. Anyone who enters these realms can see in their beatified contradictions themselves and their own examinations in the shortcomings of youth. Contradictions in old age are too recent to remember and anyway by then who can claim anything, who has not been smitten who is dead in trespasses and sins?  The contradictions pervade Psalm 8 as well, where the rebuke of the enemy and avenger is the praise of the child. Malachi Martin's  apologizes for the medieval in Loyola pretending that now "we have drugs for people  who talk like that by,"  who speak of "a universal warfare of God-made-man against a Fallen Archangel......" (The Jesuits, 182) and "any talk of 'discernment of spirits' or of controlling what enters the consciousness," (183), pure Pentecostal theology. Charismatics all going to hold hands with Pope Francis, which must be the opposite of such discernment, but one Loyola embraced.

 Not to disrespect the Jesuits, there is not going to be any new human society, no matter what. The case remains the same as in the book of Judges, where every man does what is right in his own eyes. This applies to Malachi Martin when he shows all his powers of intellect on Buckley's Firing Line, for example, still extant, so you can witness it in person, but it is all too good, too glib in speech. To slow him down we take him in print without all the innuendo, but still extreme,  both  the biblical and Jesuitical, not that the two are one. Meeting the pope is not like "to meet the Risen Christ in person in his glorified...through the very humanity of Christ, Inigo was introduced into the bodiless, eternal being of the Trinity--apparently ascending...to participate in the most hidden secrets of divinity for which human language has no words...this characteristic of genuine Christian piety--ascension to a bodiless spirit, God, through the humanity of a real man, Jesus--is a stumbling block for the non-Christian mind...by which you can find out what is authentically Christian or non-Christian' (The Jesuits, 156).

 Malachi Martin writes and understands this later in life after he has known himself that the Kingdom is "'the whole surface of the earth" (157), not disallowing that it includes the sea and the center of the earth, the air and the stratosphere of all these traveling goombahs of space. The universal warfare of the earthly kingdom produces those personal qualities in such characters' resolve of will and resourcefulness to the least, no matter what their time and place, which in the greater it produces a "cut through of the dreadful spiritual trials endured, and result in Spiritual Exercises" (158). The Exercises allow for modification of infirmity and age, but its literal directions and sense, taken rote, must stultify without the Spirit, the prior necessity of ascension and resurrection life. So living terrestrial and celestial, with constant examination of the life in the flesh, its memories and regrets, but covered with the Sacrifice in all the worlds that brings every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ, and living out of time each moment, we do not mistake that "piercing insight into the very foundation of human nature" (159). What is man that thou are mindful of him? asks over and over, which allows us not only to see the chaff in Loyola and Martin, Jacob and Abraham, but the pure grain too, hence as in ourselves. If we dare credit anything we have done we do not credit ourselves, for it is the work of the Holy One by grace in which we have been allowed to participate, but never enough of this foretaste divine.

The Road to Emmanus in Methodist thought  is a variety of the spiritual exercises of Loyola for Jesuits all good sounding but from the outside not real, but from within, ineffable, to include the Son’s body  appearing and acting on behalf of his people to include

"the Son’s body  appearing and acting on behalf of his people. However, they are also clear that this is the pre-incarnate Son. To support this distinction between a non-human bodily existence and a human bodily existence, they appeal, in part, to a distinction between ’ish and ’adam with only the former being used for the Son’s pre-incarnate, non-human bodily ap-pearances. The Son in this bodily form existed in the heavenly realm from which he could periodically enter our earthly dimension and then subsequently return.” Review of The Angel of the Lord: A Biblical, Historical, and Theological Study by Matt Foreman and Doug Van Dorn.

Photo books record all the evens 50ths, retirements, retreats, trips, displayed in albums, along with receipts, employ evaluations, work records, commendations.

   It is not against the wiles of the Jesuits, recent as they are in Central America and beyond, or against all the petty pastorates we might know in such servitude that they are at war on the wrong side, as Ellen White says of the apostate Protestantism [of the United States] that it is the beast.

To affirm and deny the truth and the false according to our own lights, the Loyola of genuine Christian piety such as shared by us all is at the same time enchained by the notion (false, utterly false, and if not false we are all of us lost, for Blessed are those who have learned to acclaim You, who walk in the light of your presence Yahweh,) "that the only weapon guaranteed by Christ to be effective in that war was the supernatural grace Christ alone could and did dispense ...through the Pope in Rome" (160).


 ----Bedfellows Malachi Martin and Ellen White, even if not in the same bed evoke the background of the fall of the Latin America Mission. This touches the  Jesuit vision for Latin America with the beast that empowers, and with the Mennonites, all in that species of inquiry we pursue in the symbolic, because to come at the actual state of events requires overturning some much subterfuge, forgery, fate, and the cycle of extermination and apology of this insane order.

The theology of Liberation, global in inception, took the Jesuits and the Marxist in Latin America to new heights, a trip together to Nicaragua where here they got their praxis, a favorite word of liberation, that and the notion that "to be a Christian is to be a revolutionary" (Malachi Martin, Jesuits 19). Not a gun toting praxis, but a poetic, involving Ruben Dario, our favorite, and Augusto Ceasar Sandino and Jesuit Faher Fernando Cardenal, whose brother did a stint with Thomas Merton in the monastery in Kentucky, so much to like. The struggle of Sandinistas against the Somozas began in 1967, four years after we had left the state and though we tried to get to Chile for the next one, ended up in Fayetteville for the domestic branch of liberation. These acts became my own embodiment of praxis in repeatio - do it once shame on you, do it twice shame on me.  I really thought there would be more and more liberation, but these are always betrayed, overtaken, superseded by the real principalities and powers we are warned against, but ignore as led by this Order. For what remains of liberation  you must skip to the DEI [Departmento Ecuménico de Investigaciones] in the Fall of the LAM about part IV.


 So will we object if the much adorned text comes to bear upon our relation to the state? You can imagine that the interpretations of this trick question never end, "is it lawful for us to give tribute to Caesar? In the context Luke 20.22 rereads, "what do we reserve for ourselves and our family and world when  we give to Caesar what is Caesars." What is Caesar's and what is Yahweh's is supposed bipolar Jesuit-Marxist-Capital struggle which in the outcome has no winners, at least to the naif, the one to be set free, at least until "all things are put under his feet."



Usurpers

Substitutes  of the greater for the less, as Zionism seeks to  represent all Jews and Israel, and the Presidential Order of 2019 now suggests, appropriate all restitution civil, spiritual, moral for itself. So if the Pope is a usurper of the church the way Zionism is of Israel which usurps the Jew, take advantage with me and see how Zionism and the Pope Francis are both together usurpers of Yeshua! We further illustrate the mind of the usurper in the essence of the problem Midrash says the angels have with man, What is Man? What is Man is the objection they bring before the Throne in Midrash, what is man that thou are mindful of him. Such an inconsequential being in angelic eyes, at least in a certain class who left their better to build Babels in the floor of the U. The essence of a man is boldly spoken by Yeshua in answer to the seven wives query, that IN THE RESURRECTION they can not die "for they are equal to the angels and are the children of Elohim, being the children of the resurrection Luke 20.36. Even an angel can extrapolate from that that if equal, then superior in that state because enfolded into the Very Creator's being. So if you were an angel and inclined to be jealous you would be jealous, but it is crowded on the ladder of usurpation with the false Israel, the Pope and Beast and the Fallen. All you Natsarim attend. True Torah Jews

There are not a lot of loose cannon prophets, priests and kings flying about combating in the spirit, whether together or apart from one another, unless you imagine a loose association of them who don't know each other, warring for the police, the school, the family, for peace upon the father, mother and children all over this land. Well if not land at least up and down streets and in homes. It sounds Ezekiel and Isaiah, it sounds of Zion, but not its imposter. It sounds prophetic that the Spirit of God would come to reside and roam in the hearts, minds and lives of these poor citizens, as so many are weak and tortured in the universalem of civilization not confined to Rome. But Rome is where the Jesuit is "the complete subjugation of all a man is, thinks, feels, and does to a practical ideal...in absolute obedience and submission...of the Roman Pope" (Jesuits, 162) being the most perfect introduction and entrance to Ellen White of the beast and the false prophet of Daniel and Revelation.

Jesuit Disorder, Malachi Martin and Ellen White in Central America

---But first, with indulgence to the case in point, which we sell in the form of these plagiarisms from our betters from a witness obtained in the events before they began.--What! before the Liberation! Yes, in concert with what is already said of these cannons who do not know, who they are, whose witness might germinate in fifty years or so and sprout, and then that sprout becomes a twig and a branch and pretty soon a little patch of witness springs up around it. We once knew, whether in the body or out, having read all unknowing Teilhard's Future and Origins, as unknowing as any can, and doing the same with a near first printing of Tractatus Logico in English still is, who was the one who was sent. Put this naif on the spot, at the birth of Liberation and see what that proves. Which to question the mission, but what can we do, so leaving that aside,  who says a sense of humor does not rule the world?

 So which is it, good or ill, and that is where we all enter and leave the world. It is called no escape, so what shall we do in the meantime is the choice of a life. To hold that all persons have in themselves before it is extirpated the vision and the spirit that reborn will through struggle and determination produce the fruit of maturity, and that this forms the record of memory and existence, and that is all you know on earth, speaks beyond the box. Just keep your hands off, for none of these issues apply to the ruling class, they are for peasants and it is the objective of the rulers to kill the spirit of humanity in the peasant and of course it is the spirit of Yeshua not only to revive but to redeem from all these, all those oppressed. But the leaders must get their heads off. So when all the leaders line up at the guillotine, all senators, teachers, managers, pastors, priests and kings line up to get their heads off, willing and unwilling, will I be there? Will I see you there? This is the holy prelude to Jerusalem and Nicaragua, but there is a problem of solution by extinction for how do we know a worse set of rulers will not arise, for they always have from revolution of various kinds? Hence we fundamentally confront our own beings flawed, which overcome in compassion and mercy, forgiveness and overlooking, actually contradict all history!!! Malachi Martin would say that these leaders, pastors, bishops, popes must inspire business leaders, a kind of chain effect, and teachers and what all, to themselves produce plans and programs to make betterment for all, fairness, into being. the man inspires the man! yes and no. It's not a man. A man, a teacher was an agency of cause, but the true cause was a changed life and that came from the author so we are quickly ineffable, and it grows, this spirit in strength as we nourish it with choices and decisions, course changes because we have been so incharitable along the way, but we change our way, we refine.

So load the gun.

 Can Marxism alleviate the social ills of Latin America, extirpate poverty or can that only be achieved by the capital formation that has done this measurably in the west.? And framed that way, as it always is, either/or, is the very perpetuation of ills always seen to force escape in some third middle way, the box forms and contains the listener, for consider if a child knowing nothing, who undergoes whatever experiences of life, does not reach the age of reflection because of this social ill and poverty and early death, thus will never know the reflection we present here, that of the impasse, the box formed of experience, for memory is the alleviation of accident, in remembering the accident we prevent its repetition, so life experience reveals its own solution, like poverty is caused by divorce,  love of the world, desiring the acceptance of others, prevents the Mission every man must attain, which can be and often is, the betterment of children solely, the presenting to them of saving and sacrifice, which result is either large or small--but in all of this individual effort the government, of religion, the instruction of teachers, all the social forces both enable and prevent.


After they are all done killing you they will want your forgiveness and your understanding for "why" they had to do it. They will call themselves ass and fool again and again even while they further consume what remains of your existence. That is the cycle of religion. Now to document it, for phylogeny recapitulates ontogeny, this cycle plays out in individual, group and national contexts. So the news reports are always making the most erroneous claims and apologizing/not apologizing for their false reports. The apology is of course further attack properly understood, except the Agencies of Forgiveness, in the victim, never acknowledge they have been further defrauded. They are complicit in this process, so the Mennonites "forgive" the Lutherans after their apology by citing a fraudulent "bridge" between the two, for the victim never dares to ascribe malign intent either in the first lie or the second, the apology. Is this for fear of further ill use, or because complicit? Don't be naive. The victims are complicit. All of this rhetoric furthers the social cause of the Jesuit in Central America as it does NBC in New York, making it seem the truth and the solution is war.

America’s Crisis, Ellen White:

“But the reader should bear in mind that there is one symbol, the second symbol of Revelation 13, which is not yet applied, and that there is one mighty nation in this western hemisphere, worthy, as we have seen, of being noted in prophecy, which is not yet brought in. That is, all the symbols but one are applied, and all the available portions of the earth, with the exception of our own government, are covered by the nations which these symbols represent. To state it in other words, of all the symbols presented, one alone, the two-horned beast of Revelation 13, is so far unapplied, and of all the countries of the earth respecting which any reason exists why they should be mentioned in prophecy at all, one alone, our own government, remains unidentified.

Do the two-horned beast and the United States belong together? Does the former symbolize the latter? If they do thus belong together, all the Biblical symbols find an application, and the whole ground is covered. If they do not thus belong to each other, it follows (1) that the United States is not represented in prophecy at all, by any of the symbols which represent the nations of the earth, which is not probable; and, secondly, that the symbol of Revelation 13:11-17 finds no government to which it can be applied, which is not possible.

 

Let us then look a little further at this symbol of Revelation 13:11-17,and see if our government has developed any features in its past history, or present character, which answer to the specifications brought to view in the symbol.

 

1. John calls this “another beast,” showing that the nation was a different one from any which had thus far been represented by any of the preceding symbols. But those symbols, as we have seen, cover all the available portions of the eastern hemisphere; hence we must look for the power intended by this symbol to the western hemisphere. And when we turn to this locality, the eye is at once attracted by our own country, the great American colossus here arising.

[possible historical contexts]

 

2. When the nation intended by this prophecy first came to the prophet’s attention, it was “coming up.” And the point of time is clearly indicated. It was when the preceding, or papal power, represented by the leopard beast, went into captivity (Revelation 13:10), or when, as already mentioned, the Papacy was temporarily over-thrown, in 1798. Was our own nation then coming up? - Most emphatically. The Declaration of Independence was issued only twenty-two years before, and the war for national freedom reached its successful termination only fourteen years before. Hence, in the two important points of chronology and location, are we held to this country, and no other, for the application of the symbol of the two-horned beast.

3. It comes up out of the earth. The preceding, or leopard beast, and the four great beasts of Daniel 7, came up out of the sea, that is, arose in territory thickly populated; for waters denote peoples and nations and tongues. Revelation 17:15; Isaiah 8:7. Coming up out of the earth would signify, by contrast with coming up out of the sea, the development of the power in question in a territory new, and previously unoccupied by civilized nations. This, again, points directly to the New World, and to our own country.

 4. It had two horns like a lamb. Such horns well symbolize the innocent, peaceful, and lamblike professions of this government. The two great principles of civil and religious liberty, - “a State without a king, and a church without a pope,” - have been the great attraction which has drawn the world to America. And this pertains equally to both branches of the really dual government, State and national, which here exists.

5. When first brought to view, it was “coming up”. That is, it was in a state of visible, tangible growth and expansion. And it was also coming up in a quiet and peaceful manner, for the words “coming up” (in the Greek, anabatnon) mean “to grow up like a plant out of the earth.” In just this way the United States has arisen. Expanding as it has, from less than three millions of people, when its independence was declared, in 1776, to over three millions and a half square miles of territory, and over sixty-five millions of people, in a little over a century, it presents an instance of national growth that has no parallel in the annals of the world. It has come up, not by conquering and subjugating other peoples, but in a quiet and peaceful manner, so much so that George Alfred Townsend, without any reference to the prophecy, in trying to describe it could think of no better figure than that which the prophet himself used nearly eighteen hundred years before. In his work entitled “The New World Compared with the Old,” page 635, contrasting the rise of this country with that of the other nationalities”

6. “He exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him.” That is, it will be no second-rate power, but as strong a nation as has ever been seen, since empire began. Our own country, as already mentioned, answers admirably to this condition.

7. “He causeth the earth, and them which dwell therein, to worship the first beast.” The first beast, as already noticed, is the Papacy; and to worship any power is to obey it in some particulars which are peculiar to itself, and in opposition to the demands of other powers. In the present case it is further explained by the words of verse 16, that (the two-horned beast) causes all to receive a mark, which is the mark of the beast (Revelation 16:2). The mark of any power is that by which it asserts its claim to supreme authority, and by which its followers are distinguished from those of every other power.

 

 In the case of the Roman Catholic Church, in reference to which these expressions are used, the worship and the mark are found in the observance of the first day of the week as the sabbath, which that church claims as its special badge of authority. See Roman Catholic catechisms. This comes into direct conflict with the authority of God, who, for reasons set forth in his word, demands the observance of the seventh day. It is impossible for anyone to obey them both; for they are intentionally placed in antagonism and opposition. Therefore, by his course with reference to these two days, as to which he will observe as the Sabbath, every one, with full intelligence in regard to the issue before him, decides whether he prefers to obey God in opposition to the church, or the church in opposition to God. And it is therefore a striking and corroborative fact that the Sabbath commandment is the only one in which the earth - the land, in contrast with them (the people) who dwell therein - as set forth in Revelation 13:12, can be caused to obey (Leviticus 26:34, 35; 2 Chronicles 36:21), and thus worship the beast. And the contest is now on in this country between these two institutions.[D.C. as a mirror Vatican strengthens this argument]

8. The nation represented by the two-horned beast is a Protestant nation; for it causes its people to worship the first beast, the Papacy, by religiously regarding some institution of the Papacy, as noted above. Now, if [?}  it were a papal nation, its citizens would voluntarily render that worship, or if enforced by the government, it would enforce the worship of itself. But here it is one power enforcing the worship of another power, and that other power is the Papacy; for it is the first beast. Therefore, this power that enforces the worship is a Protestant power, which is another feature by which it is shown that the two-horned beast applies to our own country.

 9. “He doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men.” It is another striking fact that in this country modern Spiritualism originated, through which many wonders have already appeared, and others, to the full extent of the prophecy, may just as easily follow; for Spiritualism is a masterpiece of evil to deceive; and it, according to the prophecy, is one of the great factors which is to lead the nation on in the oppressive work which it is finally to do. Verse 14. e 14. 

10. It is, lastly, to cause the people to make an image to the beast; and to do this, it says to them that dwell on the earth that they should make an image, etc. By this it plainly appears that the form of the government in question is republican, for appeal is made to the people to carry out whatever measure it is desired to secure, and by their votes [weak] the question is decided. Let us now group together these features, and note their significance:- 

 

1. The power in question must be located in the western hemisphere.

2. It comes into view at the time the first beast goes into captivity, namely, about the year 1798.

3. It rises in a quiet and peaceable manner, like a plant out of the earth, and in territory previously unoccupied by civilized nations.

4. It makes a profession which is perfectly just, innocent, and lamb-like.

5. Its progress is so rapid as to strike the beholder with wonder.

6. It is the equal of any other nation in power.

7. It enforces an institution of the Papacy - the first-day sabbath - which, when so enforced, constitutes the worship and mark of the beast.

8. It is a Protestant power.

9. It is a nation in which appear great and super-human wonders to deceive the people.

10. It is republican in its form of government.

"Of these ten specifications two things can be said: First, that they will apply perfectly to our own country, the Government of the United States; and, secondly, that if we try to apply them to any other government, they will be found to be utter failures. The two-horned beast, therefore, symbolizes the Government of the United States, and cannot be applied to any other nation. Behind these ten lines of defense the argument for this position lies impregnably intrenched. 

 

But a painful sequel follows; for, according to the conditions of the prophecy, some of them already alluded to, this same power is to commit itself to ways that are dark and inscrutable, and, contrary to all its profession of justice and innocence, enter upon a systematic and legal course of religious persecution against those who would obey the truth of God, according to His word. 

 

While the beast has the horns of “a lamb,” it speaks “as a dragon.” Into these somber features the whole current of this prophecy at last resolves itself. If the first beast represents the Papacy, as is the conviction of all genuine Protestants, and if that system is utterly subversive of the word of God, being the anthropological horn of Daniel 7, the man of sin and son of perdition spoken of by Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2, and the antichrist of John, then to worship that beast is to apostatize from God; and the two-horned beast, by enforcing that worship, shows itself to be an enemy of God and the opposer of true religion.

 

If Sunday, as a rest day, which Rome claims as a mark of her power to rule the church, is the antagonist and rival of the Sabbath of the Lord, as is proved by the Scriptures, then the two-horned beast, by compelling people to receive such mark, arrays itself on the side of evil, and forces men into a position of antagonism with Jehovah. The image which he causes the people to make is an image of the beast.

We can determine what an image of the Papacy will be by considering what constituted the Papacy itself in its days of power. As brought to view in the prophecy, it may be defined as an ecclesiastical hierarchy, exercising the self-assumed prerogative of defining heresy, and having the control of the civil arm to punish the same. An image of this would be an ecclesiastical organization, having control of the civil power to carry out its own decisions and purposes. This would of course be a virtual union of Church and State.

 

This the founders of our government intended to guard against, but for just this thing, by a lamentable oversight, they have left the way all open. Such an organization in this country would be a reproduction of the first beast in character, and surely reenact its tyrannical works. The image is not only an image of the beast, but it is an image made to the beast, indicating on the part of those who make the image, an abject deference to, and collusion with, that beast; which, to say the least, is most astonishing in a professedly Protestant country. When people began, years ago, to study these specifications of the prophecy, they were able to draw only one conclusion, and that is that the country represented by the two-horned beast would, in the end, virtually renounce its Protestantism, its republicanism, ignore its professions of lamb-like innocence, and, fired with the spirit of the Papacy, which is the spirit of the dragon the second wild beast supports the former wild beast but with more subtlety, intelligence, and culture Because of this seductiveness, and of his efforts to support his mission with higher sanctions (Revelation 13:13), he is called in later chapters (Revelation 16:13; Revelation 19:20; Revelation 20:10) the False Prophet this beast as self deceit - that form of plausibility by which men persuaded themselves into a belief that they might without harm worship the former beast. assume a plausible exterior, that men may be beguiled.

In Daniel 8:5-7 a male goat with a large horn between his eyes suddenly arises from the west and smashes both horns of the ram. The angel Gabriel tells Daniel this goat represents the kingdom of Greece and its large horn is its first king, which would be shown by later history to be Alexander the Great (Daniel 8:21). After over 200 years of rule, the Medo-Persian Empire came to an end in 331 B.C. This prophecy of a male goat, which represents the same kingdom as the third beast of Daniel 7, takes an unusual turn in verse 8. The large horn being broken represents Alexander’s untimely death at the young age of 33." end of Ellen White