David Icke. Mechanical Oscillation in The Destruction of the Real. Destruction of the Sacred. .

Look, how can you not like someone banned from Australia? How can you not like any of these pariahs, like Alex Jones? Do you really think Hollywood stars are NOT reptiles? and the senators, and top athletes controlled the way David Icke might? So of course we like them, they bring up stuff against the casino, change the odds a little.  Unless you're one of those followers of the little black box in your hand and never really look at all this is good or at least ood.  And if its bad too, like opinions of Sumerian politics, space aliens, underground bases. You better get off your hobby horse and see the human reality for what it is- that the good and the bad is true for everyone. The vain and the wise, the righteous and the sinner combined.  Joe Rogan, Alex Jones, David Icke, Clif High pass for public reason, but morality is only expressed by the newscasters. Don't blame Ikes for the extremity society gone mad.

Take it as given that this is so and play occasionally at producing paradigms of reality yourself, like A NEW GREEN DEAL on youtube which mocks with transparent frivolity, done March of 2008 though, and only comes due in 2020. In the same measure, Pretend the Machine's Human was on Sound Cloud in 2013, and A Secret Life of Democrats (11-14)from 1985 all the way to 2020. So whatever criticisms of concepts and words that follows these sites must be taken in the context that the world is mad and these are what pass for sanity. And they are mad too. Everything about life since the digital is a farce. Dad laugh. Me, I'm making cement blocks to mock the absurdity of art, and politics too, because I will build the wall!


Ingenious really, that the process of initiation to fame of this competition. Their Holders the Great Nephs, are indifferent to anything except the process, so let them fight it out. What is this process? Initiate imitation and deconstruction. They take a line from Tesla's Mechanical oscillation. He built a little device, set it clicking on a construction project and the building began to shake. He turned it off so the whole building didn't fall down. But the principle emerged as a physical law, imitation can destroy the real. Shake the molecules by echoing, splitting, mocking, initiating, them.

 This applies to all traditional thought, esp. to the Scripture, because IT IS WRITTEN--with authority, hence it must be defamed. Both Old and New Testament are the most echoed, deconstructed writings ever known. An example of how this works is offered at Taking Down the Elder. The purpose is to shake its authority, shake it to death. take one truth, mix in a falsehood, shake together and Presto, the truth is shaken. It is defamed because as the rabbis say,it is efficacious in itself, it is written for all time and because all the promises are, for us, YES AND AMEN in Iesu, the Son: as it reads:

 Therefore the redeemed of Yahweh shall return, and come with singing unto Zion; and everlasting joy shall be upon their head: they shall obtain gladness and joy; and sorrow and mourning shall flee away. (Isaiah 51.11. p. 8581)

  2. This destruction of the sacred also spilled over into literature. The Nanoites ended up doing to themselves what they did to others but you never hear such apparatus applied to the Dogon Nomo, the Zulu Moon theories, the celeb Castaneda, the visions of Ayuhausca of Tao Lin. These pass as unexamined truth because the uncritical replaces the authentic once the truth has been shaken away!

3.  Icke is selling the faceted new world order that he exposes, such as the Masons, etc, etc. he is another of the reformist clones dredged up by the Order, like Alex jones, to impugn them to reveal them so they can show their power. That is the purpose of other alt sites like Breitbart, Drudge, publicize their opponents giving them even more power in a tit for tat that consumes all the oxygen. They mutually exposit each other. 

 All putative earth saviors sound like a sales job at the close of sale, betrayed by gesture, voice and syntax. The same thing happens to a more worthy speaker, the Clif High Priest himself when he goes off about the Vatican Library revealing the chimera of history, the cloth of Fomenko, Biglino, Kozyrev, with the schizo-typical Sapolsky, not that he's wrong exactly, but the stress, the soapbox confirms it is a Babylonian confusion, an oscillation in all society.

So such things as Icke selling work for the reptiles he supposedly exposes, who are so intelligent, or their handlers are, to  deploy constant riptides and crosscurrents so that the greatest advocates of the elite are those who oppose them! See Alex Jones give the sign! Being both for and against themselves. Is Icke aware of his paymaster? It reminds of the confrontation Chris Constantine had in Hyde Park with Icke. There's nothing like coming face to face with your own hologram. Icke's claims that Jesus is Appolyon and that  Messiah means crocodile. We see of course that after he has denatured every seraphim and New Jerusalem, further shaking and destruction of the sacred so he is then free to substitute his own images of reptile holograms he obtained from Amazonian and Zulu shamans. His marathon presentations are like any other cult programmer. Give them enough rope and they'll hang you. Grant the first premise and suck up the rest. Icke's notion of Saturn, founded in David Talbot's work with the Thunderbolts, the katabole, and on is a further borrowing offered with the Zulu, and he likewise holds with  Max Spiers how the Bloodlines are the hybrid vessels that rule under these hyper-dimensional forces that broadcast their DNA into the human. That is, that 98% of the uncoded DNA is a projection of this fallen human perception, thoughtform, gregori, to prevent the human being what he in fact is. That disembodied triangle above the pyramid on the dollar bill is a symbol of this eye of the watchers. So give points for decoding. 

 But this is the crux, merely knowing of the emanations of the Archon reptile brain, but not the only name of them by far, does nothing toward freeing the man from its grasp. Neither Spiers nor Talbot  nor Icke tell what the heart is or how to know it or how to loose in it those energies and thoughts that are its right purchased by Messiah. That's too bad, for there is one and only one deliverer in all this who makes clear over and over again his relation to the heart in such passages as I stand at the door and knock. 

  So we must conclude that laudable as their works are and wonderful as their revelations to us they are elements of the gregori thoughtform. For knowing about evil powers and defeating them are not the same.

David Icke in his series Saturn isn’t what you think and  Who built the moon

says (what Spiers does) that the heart of man unlocks his prison and frees him from all these emotional low vibe frequencies of  Saturn that are magnified by the moon. Tales of Saturn here.  But that prison break is Iesu! In who built the moon maybe Icke is tired, the voice becomes insistent and shrill and he is a lot too insistent, acts like a Democrat, that we are all part of a prepackaged hive mind. Oh to have been left out of the competition. Never been in the group mind. And if in always been kicked out. Groups, churches, universities, all of their codes of participation. Not to speak of all it being hologram anyway.

Edwardo Galeano Changes His Mind

"Author Changes His Mind on ’70s Manifesto"

By Larry Rohter

For more than 40 years, Eduardo Galeano’s “The Open Veins of Latin America” has been the canonical anti-colonialist, anti-capitalist and anti-American text in that region. Hugo Chávez, Venezuela’s populist president, put a copy, which he had called “a monument in our Latin American history,” in President Obama’s hands the first time they met. But now Galeano, a 73-year-old Uruguayan writer, has disavowed the book, saying that he was not qualified to tackle the subject and that it was badly written. Predictably, his remarks have set off a vigorous regional debate, with the right doing some “we told you so” gloating, and the left clinging to a dogged defensiveness.

 

“ ‘Open Veins’ tried to be a book of political economy, but I didn’t yet have the necessary training or preparation,” Mr. Galeano said last month while answering questions at a book fair in Brazil, where he was being honored on the 43rd anniversary of the book’s publication. He added: “I wouldn’t be capable of reading this book again; I’d keel over. For me, this prose of the traditional left is extremely leaden, and my physique can’t tolerate it.”

 

“The Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of the Pillage of a Continent” was written at the dawn of the 1970s, a decade when much of Latin America was governed by repressive right-wing military dictatorships supported by the United States. In this 300-page cri de coeur, Mr. Galeano argued that the riches that first attracted European colonizers, like gold and sugar, gave rise to a system of exploitation that led inexorably to “the contemporary structure of plunder” that he held responsible for Latin America’s chronic poverty and underdevelopment.

 

Mr. Galeano, whose work includes soccer commentary, poetry, cartoons and histories like “Memory of Fire,” wrote in “Open Veins”: “I know I can be accused of sacrilege in writing about political economy in the style of a novel about love or pirates. But I confess I get a pain from reading valuable works by certain sociologists, political experts, economists and historians who write in code.”

“Open Veins” has been translated into more than a dozen languages and has sold more than a million copies. In its heyday, its influence extended throughout what was then called the third world, including Africa and Asia, until the economic rise of China and India and Brazil seemed to undercut parts of its thesis.

In the United States, “Open Veins” has been widely taught on university campuses since the 1970s, in courses ranging from history and anthropology to economics and geography. But Mr. Galeano’s unexpected takedown of his own work has left scholars wondering how to deal with the book in class.

Hugo Chávez, president of Venezuela, handing President Obama a copy of Eduardo Galeano's "The Open Veins of Latin America" in 2009. Credit: Matthew Cavanaugh/European Pressphoto Agency

“If I were teaching this in a course,” said Merilee Grindle, president of the Latin American Studies Association and director of the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard, “I would take his comments, add them in and use them to generate a far more interesting discussion about how we see and interpret events at different points in time.” And that seems to be exactly what many professors plan to do.

 

Caroline S. Conzelman, a cultural anthropologist who teaches at the University of Colorado, Boulder, said her first thought was that she wouldn’t change how she used the book, “because it still captures the essence of the emotional memory of being colonized.” But now, she said: “I will have them read what he says about it. It’s good for students to see that writers can think critically about their own work and go back and revise what they meant.”

Michael Yates, the editorial director of Monthly Review Press, Mr. Galeano’s American publisher, dismissed the entire discussion as “nothing but a tempest in a teapot.” “Open Veins” is Monthly Review’s best-selling book — it surged, if briefly, into Amazon’s Top 10 list within hours of Mr. Obama’s receiving a copy — and Mr. Yates said he saw no reason to make any changes: “Please! The book is an entity independent of the writer and anything he might think now.”

Precisely why Mr. Galeano chose to renounce his book now is unclear. Through his American agent, Susan Bergholz, he declined to elaborate. She said he had gradually grown “horrified by the prose and the phraseology” of “Open Veins.”

 

Mr. Yates said Mr. Galeano might simply be following in the tracks of the novelist John Dos Passos, a radical as a young man “who became a conservative when he got older.” On Spanish- and Portuguese-language websites, others have suggested that Mr. Galeano, who in recent years has had both a heart attack and cancer, might simply be off his game intellectually.

 

In his remarks in Brazil, Mr. Galeano acknowledged that the left sometimes “commits grave errors” when it is in power, which has been taken in Latin America as a criticism of Cuba under the Castro brothers and of the erratic stewardship of Venezuela under Mr. Chávez, who died last year. But Mr. Galeano described himself as still very much a man of the left, and on other occasions he has praised the experiments in social democracy underway for the last decade in his own country, as well as in Brazil and Chile.

 

“Reality has changed a lot, and I have changed a lot,” he said in Brazil, adding: “Reality is much more complex precisely because the human condition is diverse. Some political sectors close to me thought such diversity was a heresy. Even today, there are some survivors of this type who think that all diversity is a threat. Fortunately, it is not.”

The Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano, in 2012.CreditSergio Goya/dpa-Corbis

Still, Mr. Galeano has caught many admirers by surprise, including the Chilean novelist Isabel Allende, who wrote a foreword for the English-language edition of “Open Veins.” In it, she describes how she “devoured” the book as a young woman “with such emotion that I had to read it again a couple more times to absorb all its meaning” and took it into exile after Gen. Augusto Pinochet seized power.

“I had dinner with him less than a year ago, and to me, he was the same man, passionate and talkative and interesting and funny,” she said of Mr. Galeano in a telephone interview from California, where she now lives. “He may have changed, and I didn’t notice it, but I don’t think so.”

In the mid-1990s, three advocates of free-market policies — the Colombian writer and diplomat Plinio Apuleyo Mendoza, the exiled Cuban author Carlos Alberto Montaner and the Peruvian journalist and author Álvaro Vargas Llosa — reacted to Mr. Galeano with a polemic of their own, “Guide to the Perfect Latin American Idiot.” They dismissed “Open Veins” as “the idiot’s bible,” and reduced its thesis to a single sentence: “We’re poor; it’s their fault.”

Mr. Montaner responded to Mr. Galeano’s recent remarks with a blog post titled “Galeano Corrects Himself and the Idiots Lose Their Bible.” In Brazil, Rodrigo Constantino, the author of “The Caviar Left,” took an even harsher tone, blaming Mr. Galeano’s analysis and prescription for many of Latin America’s ills. “He should feel really guilty for the damage he caused,” he wrote on his blog.

But Mr. Galeano continues to have defenders. In a discussion on the website of the Spanish newspaper El País, one participant noted that in a world dominated by Apple, Samsung, Siemens, Panasonic, Sony and Airbus, Mr. Galeano’s lament that “the goddess of technology does not speak Spanish” seems even more prescient than in 1971.

And on his Facebook page, Camilo Egaña, a Cuban émigré who is the host of “Mirador Mundial” on CNN en Español, remembered meeting Mr. Galeano in Havana in the 1980s and hearing him tell a story about a man taking his son to the ocean for the first time. “In the face of that interminable blue, the child said to the man, ‘Daddy, help me to see,’ ” Mr. Egaña recalled.

“That is what Galeano has done with his book, 43 years after it having been published,” Mr. Egaña concluded. “Thank you.”